Current:Home > MarketsProud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing delayed in seditious conspiracy case -FutureFinance
Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing delayed in seditious conspiracy case
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-07 16:54:46
Washington — Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio's sentencing hearing, which had been scheduled for Wednesday, has been delayed due to the judge being out sick, a U.S. Marshals Service spokesperson said. The court says his sentencing has been rescheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 5. Tarrio is to be sentenced for numerous felony counts tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol assault including seditious conspiracy.
Tarrio and three subordinates — Joseph Biggs, Ethan Nordean and Zachary Rehl — were found guilty in May of seditious conspiracy, the most serious charge brought in the Justice Department's sprawling probe of the breach. A jury in Washington, D.C., found another co-defendant, Dominic Pezzola, not guilty of that most severe charge, but convicted him on other counts. Nordean, who was also supposed to be sentenced Wednesday, will be sentenced Friday.
Prosecutors have asked federal Judge Timothy Kelly to send Tarrio and Biggs to prison for 33 years — the longest sentencing request so far — and alleged they "and the men they recruited and led participated in every consequential breach at the Capitol on January 6."
In court filings earlier this month, the Justice Department alleged Tarrio and his co-defendants worked to bring about a "revolution" and argued they should be punished accordingly.
"The defendants personally deployed force against the government on January 6," prosecutors wrote, urging Kelly to apply an enhanced sentence, based on allegations that the Proud Boys engaged in conduct related to terrorism — that is, they were found guilty of retaliating against their government.
Although Tarrio wasn't at the Capitol on Jan. 6, prosecutors in their sentencing papers called him the "primary organizer" of the conspiracy and said he used his outsized influence "to condone and promote violence" in others. "He was a general rather than a soldier."
But Tarrio's attorneys pushed back in a sentencing filing of their own, calling the Justice Department's terrorism recommendation "arbitrary" and unnecessary.
"Participating in a plan for the Proud Boys to protest on January 6 is not the same as directing others on the ground to storm the Capitol by any means necessary. In fact, Tarrio was not in contact with anyone during the event he is alleged to have led or organized," the defense attorneys argued.
During a months-long hearing earlier this year, prosecutors presented evidence that soon after the election, Tarrio began posting on social media and in message groups about a "civil war," later threatening, "No Trump…No peace. No Quarter."
"Let's bring this new year in with one word in mind: revolt," he wrote on Jan. 6, 2021, according to the government's evidence.
Nordean, Rehl, Biggs and Pezzola gathered with over 100 Proud Boys near the Washington Monument on Jan. 6, 2021, around the time that President Donald Trump was speaking at the White House Ellipse, and the government contends they then marched to the Capitol, where they were accused of participating in and encouraging the violence.
"Make no mistake, we did this," Tarrio wrote on social media during the riot.
"Did Enrique Tarrio make comments that were egregious? Absolutely," Tarrio's defense attorney asked the jury in closing arguments. "You may not like what he said, but it is First Amendment-protected speech."
But the jurors were unconvinced and convicted Tarrio of seditious conspiracy and other crimes.
Tarrio and his co-defendants are not the first Jan. 6 defendants to be sentenced for seditious conspiracy. Stewart Rhodes, the founder of the far-right group known as the Oath Keepers, was sentenced to 18 years in prison after a jury found him guilty of the crime. The sentence was lower than the 25 years recommended by prosecutors.
The Justice Department has said it plans to appeal that sentence, and many Oath Keepers defendants, including Rhodes, are appealing their convictions.
- In:
- Proud Boys
veryGood! (136)
Related
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Bill McKibben Talks about his Life in Writing and Activism
- In Attacks on Environmental Advocates in Canada, a Disturbing Echo of Extremist Politics in the US
- Energy Production Pushing Water Supply to Choke Point
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Carbon Markets Pay Off for These States as New Businesses, Jobs Spring Up
- Biden Signs Sweeping Orders to Tackle Climate Change and Rollback Trump’s Anti-Environment Legacy
- This And Just Like That Star Also Just Learned About Kim Cattrall's Season 2 Cameo
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Smoke From Western Wildfires Darkens the Skies of the East Coast and Europe
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- A Seismic Pollution Shift Presents a New Problem in Illinois’ Climate Fight
- Spoil Your Dad With the Best Father's Day Gift Ideas Under $50 From Nordstrom Rack
- Bling Empire Stars Pay Tribute to “Mesmerizing” Anna Shay Following Her Death
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- As Wildfire Smoke Blots Out the Sun in Northern California, Many Ask: ‘Where Are the Birds?’
- Taylor Swift and Matty Healy Break Up After Whirlwind Romance
- Country singer Kelsea Ballerini hit in the face with bracelet while performing
Recommendation
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
A German Initiative Seeks to Curb Global Emissions of a Climate Super-Pollutant
How Much Does Climate Change Cost? Biden Raises Carbon’s Dollar Value, but Not by Nearly Enough, Some Say
Travis Scott not criminally liable for Astroworld Festival deaths, grand jury finds
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Read full text of the Supreme Court affirmative action decision and ruling in high-stakes case
Exxon Accused of Pressuring Witnesses in Climate Fraud Case
How the Trump Administration’s Climate Denial Left Its Mark on The Arctic Council