Current:Home > StocksKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -FutureFinance
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-28 07:46:48
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (47995)
Related
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- After a Rough Year, Farmers and Congress Are Talking About Climate Solutions
- Lessons from Germany to help solve the U.S. medical debt crisis
- China reduces COVID-19 case number reporting as virus surges
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Below Deck’s Kate Chastain Response to Ben Robinson’s Engagement Will Put Some Wind in Your Sails
- Perceiving without seeing: How light resets your internal clock
- Coast Guard Plan to Build New Icebreakers May Be in Trouble
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Demi Lovato Recalls Feeling So Relieved After Receiving Bipolar Diagnosis
Ranking
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- I felt it drop like a rollercoaster: Driver describes I-95 collapse in Philadelphia
- Kendall Jenner Shares Cheeky Bikini Photos From Tropical Getaway
- Shop the Best Lululemon Deals: $78 Tank Tops for $29, $39 Biker Shorts & More
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- J. Harrison Ghee, Alex Newell become first openly nonbinary Tony winners for acting
- How did COVID warp our sense of time? It's a matter of perception
- Law requires former research chimps to be retired at a federal sanctuary, court says
Recommendation
Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
Government Delays Pipeline Settlement Following Tribe Complaint
Spring Is Coming Earlier to Wildlife Refuges, and Bird Migrations Need to Catch Up
Elizabeth Warren on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
The White House Goes Solar. Why Now?
Supreme Court allows border restrictions for asylum-seekers to continue for now
Coast Guard Plan to Build New Icebreakers May Be in Trouble