Current:Home > InvestA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -FutureFinance
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-19 04:24:29
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (97525)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Solar flares reported during total eclipse as sun nears solar maximum. What are they?
- Why Luke Bryan Isn't Shocked About Katy Perry's Departure From American Idol
- Idaho teen faces federal terrorism charge. Prosecutors say he planned to attack a church for ISIS
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Here's where U.S. homeowners pay the most — and least — in property taxes
- The keys for Monday night’s national title game between UConn and Purdue
- Norfolk Southern agrees to pay $600 million for East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Photos from total solar eclipse show awe as moon covers sun
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Naya Rivera’s Ex Ryan Dorsey Mourns Death of Dog He Shared With Late Glee Star
- 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' finale director explains 'Seinfeld' echoes: A 'big middle finger'
- After Appalachian hospitals merged into a monopoly, their ERs slowed to a crawl
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- ‘Civil War’ might be the year’s most explosive movie. Alex Garland thinks it’s just reporting
- Photos from total solar eclipse show awe as moon covers sun
- Feeling nauseous? Here's how to feel better, according to experts
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Solar flares reported during total eclipse as sun nears solar maximum. What are they?
Sister of Maine mass shooting victim calls lawmakers’ 11th-hour bid for red flag law ‘nefarious’
Mel B Reveals Why She Got Kicked Out of the Spice Girls Group Chat
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
Billie Eilish announces details of third album, 'Hit Me Hard and Soft'
Gwen Stefani Addresses Blake Shelton Divorce Rumors
Why is looking at a solar eclipse dangerous without special glasses? Eye doctors explain.