Current:Home > StocksChiquita funded Colombian terrorists for years. A jury now says the firm is liable for killings. -FutureFinance
Chiquita funded Colombian terrorists for years. A jury now says the firm is liable for killings.
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 04:34:14
Chiquita Brands was ordered Monday by a Florida jury to pay $38.3 million to the families of eight people killed by a right-wing paramilitary group in Colombia, which the banana grower had funded for years during that country's violent civil war.
Chiquita had previously acknowledged funding the paramilitary group, pleading guilty in 2007 after the U.S. Department of Justice charged the company with providing payments to what the agency labeled a "terrorist organization." The group, the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, or AUC, received payments from Chiquita from about 1997 through 2004, which the company had described as "security payments" during the country's internal conflict.
The decision marks the first time an American jury has held a large U.S. corporation liable for a major human rights violation in another country, according to EarthRights International, a human rights firm that represented one family in the case. Chiquita still faces thousands of other claims from victims of the AUC, and Monday's decision could pave the way for more cases to come to trial or for a "global settlement," said Marco Simons, EarthRights general counsel, in a press conference to discuss the jury's decision.
"Chiquita had a very high degree of understanding of the armed conflict in Colombia," Simons said. "This wasn't some bumbling U.S. corporation that didn't know what was going on in the country where it was operating."
In a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, Chiquita said it will appeal the jury's verdict.
"The situation in Colombia was tragic for so many, including those directly affected by the violence there, and our thoughts remain with them and their families," the company said in the statement. "However, that does not change our belief that there is no legal basis for these claims. While we are disappointed by the decision, we remain confident that our legal position will ultimately prevail."
Chiquita has insisted that its Colombia subsidiary, Banadex, only made the payments out of fear that AUC would harm its employees and operations, court records show.
Reacting to the ruling on social media, Colombia President Gustavo Petro questioned why the U.S. justice system could "determine" Chiquita financed paramilitary groups, while judges in Colombia have not ruled against the company.
"The 2016 peace deal … calls for the creation of a tribunal that will disclose judicial truths, why don't we have one?" Petro posted on X, referencing the year the civil conflict ended.
The verdict followed a six-week trial and two days of deliberations. The EarthRights case was originally filed in July 2007 and was combined with several other lawsuits.
"Target on their back"
The AUC was also categorized as a "foreign terrorist organization" by the U.S. State Department in 2001, a designation that made supporting the paramilitary group a federal crime. Chiquita provided the group with 100 payments amounting to almost $2 million in funding, the Justice Department said in 2007.
Several decades ago, when the conflict in Colombia drove down prices of land in the country's banana-growing regions, Chiquita took advantage of the situation by expanding its operations, said Marissa Vahlsing, EarthRights director of transnational legal strategy.
"They knew this would put a target on their back, being a large multinational corporation," with FARC, or the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, a leftist rebel group, Vahlsing said. That prompted Chiquita to turn to the AUC for protection, she added.
Chiquita executives testified during the trial that its AUC payments were voluntary and that the company wasn't threatened by the paramilitary group to make the payments, Simons said.
"We think the jury saw through Chiquita's defense, that they were threatened and had to make payments to save lives," Simons said. "The jury also rejected Chiquita's defense that they put forward, which is known as a duress defense, that they had no other choice, they had to do this."
Brutal killings
The AUC was more brutal than the rebels they were fighting against, Simons said. The cases brought by survivors of people killed by the paramilitary group included one involving a young girl traveling with her mother and stepfather in a taxi, when they were pulled over by AUC members. She witnessed her parents murdered by the group, who then gave her a few pesos for transportation back to town, EarthRights said.
Simons noted that one former Chiquita executive, when asked during the trial if he was concerned about payments to the terrorist group, responded that as a human being it concerned him. But, the executive added, "As chief accounting officer, to make sure that the records are appropriate, it was not part of my deliberation," according to Simons.
"That is unfortunately the way a lot of the the multinational folks think," Simons said. "They check their humanity at the door when they engage in business practices."
—With reporting by the Associated Press.
Aimee PicchiAimee Picchi is the associate managing editor for CBS MoneyWatch, where she covers business and personal finance. She previously worked at Bloomberg News and has written for national news outlets including USA Today and Consumer Reports.
TwitterveryGood! (72)
Related
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Inside Clean Energy: Some Straight Talk about Renewables and Reliability
- Fish on Valium: A Multitude of Prescription Drugs Are Contaminating Florida’s Waterways and Marine Life
- Why Kim Kardashian Isn't Ready to Talk to Her Kids About Being Upset With Kanye West
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Teen Mom's Tyler Baltierra Details Pure Organic Love He Felt During Reunion With Daughter Carly
- Who are the Hunter Biden IRS whistleblowers? Joseph Ziegler, Gary Shapley testify at investigation hearings
- Save $200 on This Dyson Cordless Vacuum and Give Your Home a Deep Cleaning With Ease
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Inside Clean Energy: Well That Was Fast: Volkswagen Quickly Catching Up to Tesla
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- NASCAR Star Jimmie Johnson's 11-Year-Old Nephew & In-Laws Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide
- Ex-Florida lawmaker behind the 'Don't Say Gay' law pleads guilty to COVID relief fraud
- Robert Smith of The Cure convinces Ticketmaster to give partial refunds, lower fees
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Why Taylor Lautner Doesn't Want a Twilight Reboot
- Biden Is Losing His Base on Climate Change, a New Pew Poll Finds. Six in 10 Democrats Don’t Feel He’s Doing Enough
- Shining a Light on Suicide Risk for Wildland Firefighters
Recommendation
'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
Abortion messaging roils debate over Ohio ballot initiative. Backers said it wasn’t about that
Biggest “Direct Air Capture” Plant Starts Pulling in Carbon, But Involves a Fraction of the Gas in the Atmosphere
Big Oil’s Top Executives Strike a Common Theme in Testimony on Capitol Hill: It Never Happened
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
Alabama woman confesses to fabricating kidnapping
Global Methane Pledge Offers Hope on Climate in Lead Up to Glasgow
Stanford University president to resign following research controversy
Tags
Like
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Climate activists target nation's big banks, urging divestment from fossil fuels
- UNEP Chief Inger Andersen Says it’s Easy to Forget all the Environmental Progress Made Over the Past 50 Years. Climate Change Is Another Matter